Saturday 19 April 2014
Advertise  |  Subscribe  |  Register  | 

Close

About cookies: we use cookies to support features like login and sharing articles. Keep cookies enabled to enjoy the full site experience. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review our cookies information for more details.

ECJ sides with Commission on EU staff pay dispute

By Tim King  -  12.09.2013 / 16:22 CET
Commission argues that exceptional economic circumstances had not been met to justify changes in calculations of staff pay increases.

A legal opinion prepared for the European Court of Justice sides with the European Commission against the member states in a dispute over pay increases for European Union staff.

At issue is whether the Council of Ministers acted legally when it decided that exceptional economic circumstances justified not keeping to a formula previously agreed with staff unions for calculating annual pay increases.

According to Yves Bot, an advocate general of the court, the judges of the court should annul a decision of the Council of Ministers taken on 19 December 2011 to reject the Commission's proposal for a pay increase of 1.7%. That proposal was based on a formula that uses the average of purchasing power of civil servants in a group of reference member states and an indexation for the cost of living in Brussels.

The Commission argued that although the EU's rules did allow for the suspension of the pay formula in exceptional economic circumstances, those conditions had not been met, so it was legally obliged to stick to the formula and propose a pay increase.

The lawyer considered three cases that have been brought before the court, all concerning the mechanism for a pay increase. Various member states joined the legal actions in one or more of the cases to side with the Council of Ministers – the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Latvia, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom.

In two cases, the advocate general sides with the Commission against the member states.

The advocate general considers a third case should be ruled inadmissible.

The advocate general's opinion, published today (12 September),
is not binding on the judges of the court.

© 2014 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Varrow

Most viewed in EU governance

Hungary breaches EU data protection law

Government ignored independence of data protection supervisor, EU court holds.

hungary

EU data retention rules struck down You need an active subscription to read this article

Rules on storing internet and phone user data are disproportionate, says EU's highest court.

TELECOMS1004
notes

Related articles

Rules on storing internet and phone user data are disproportionate, says EU's highest court.

Government ignored independence of data protection supervisor, EU court holds.

Compromise bolsters victims' rights but not at expense of European Commission leniency programme.

Mothers that have children through a surrogate cannot claim maternity leave, court rules.

So much for all being equal before the law...An appalling tale of discrimination reaches us from Luxembourg, courtesy of a report in Le Jeudi, by the always well- informed Dominique Seytre.

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website

Please, copy the code on the left into the box on the right

 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website

Advertisement

Cookies info | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions