Go to the Content   Friday, 25 May 2012
 

An objective and fair selection procedure

31.01.2008 / 00:00 CET
With reference to the letter of Aris Apollonatos (‘Communications breakdown in Commission entry-test', 24-30 January), I would like to make some comments on behalf of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO). The office had been entrusted by the EU institutions with CAST 27, a selection procedure (not an open competition) aiming at establishing lists of experts in different fields who could potentially be hired as contract agents (not permanent officials), normally with time-limited contracts.
Among the challenges EPSO had to face were the high number of candidates applying, the limited time it had to test them and the need to keep the whole procedure objective and fair. The European Commission wished to dispose of lists largely exceeding the number of prospective positions it could offer, so as to have a real choice of candidates for each post to be filled.
The selection procedure followed the lines described by Apollonatos. It can be agreed that a multiple-choice test based on knowledge of facts is not always the best way to test the real skills of a candidate, in particular in areas where factors like ingenuity, intellectual curiosity and synthetic thought processes are of paramount importance.
But the point that Apollonatos is missing – and like him several candidates – is that EPSO endeavoured to present the Commission, as requested, with a long list of candidates having a real interest for the domain and sufficient knowledge of facts in the area of inform-ation, media and communication in the EU, as well as verbal and numerical reasoning skills, but that this is not the final step. It is up to the institution then to choose within the lists those candidates best suited to perform the jobs at hand and this the Commission will do via in-depth interviews where invited candidates will be able to prove that they possess the qualities and professional skills required of press officers and communication specialists.

Alan Piotrowski
EPSO
European Commission
Brussels

Please log in to read this article:

Log-in

Password

Forgot your password? Just type in your e-mail address and click on the Log In button

 

Don't have a login yet?

Discover your benefits and register for free now! It only takes a minute.

 Register for free

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2012 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Varrow

Most viewed in Comment

Related articles

There is a ‘fire problem' and it costs hundreds of lives a year.

Burying the Lisbon treaty would not paralyse the EU.

Europe is in danger of undermining its competitiveness byt backing policy proposals that have no track record of boosting innovation.

Liquid biofuels – ethanol and ‘biodiesel' – have captured the worldwide and European fascination as renewable energy for the transport sector, but the tide seems to be turning now that people are realising the inherent challenges of leaping into a liquid biofuels policy in the absence of adequate consideration of the down-stream results.

A handful of European shoemakers are soon likely to request an extension of EU anti-dumping duties on leather footwear from Vietnam and China. But contrary to what your article may lead people into thinking (‘Shoemakers fight cheap imports', 24-29 April), these producers do not speak in the interest of the majority of the European footwear industry, let alone European consumers.

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website
 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website

Advertisement

Privacy policy | Terms & conditions