Back to the drawing-board
By Jennifer Rankin - 07.01.2010 / 05:17 CET
Disappointed with the deal struck in
Copenhagen, the EU will have to decide quickly whether to continue its climate-change policy of leading by example, or to take a tougher approach.
Please log in to read this article:
Don't have a login yet?
Discover your benefits and register for free now! It only takes a minute.

© 2012 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Fact file
Falling short of EU ambition
õ The world should work to restrict global warming to less than 2°C above pre-industrial levels.
The EU had hoped for targets to lock countries into this goal, but had also wanted a commitment to cut global emissions by 50% by 2050 and by 80%-95% for developed countries.
õ Countries should take action to reduce emissions in line with science. Emission reduction targets from developing countries and developing country efforts – “nationally appropriate mitigation actions” (NAMAs) – will be set out in an annexe to the document.
The EU wanted actions that would cut emissions by at least 25% by 2020 compared to 1990 – in line with the lower estimated range given by scientists through the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. But the pledges being discussed add up to a reduction of just 18%.
õ Least-developed countries and those most vulnerable to climate change should get funding “approaching $30 billion” (€21bn) between 2010 and 2012 to help them adapt to climate change.
The Copenhagen accord is very close to the EU goals on fast-track finance. The EU thinks that the least-developed countries should get €15bn-€21bn in 2010-12 and has promised to contribute €7.4bn ($10.2bn) of this total over three years.
õ Rich countries should mobilise to raise $100bn (€70bn) a year from public and private sources.
EU leaders agreed in October that the total bill could be around €100bn - €30bn more than the estimate in the UN accord.
õ Deadlines: Early drafts of the declaration referred to reaching a binding legal agreement “as soon as possible” and no later than December 2010 at the next big climate conference in Mexico City. But this was dropped from the final text. A review of the Copenhagen accord is planned for 2015, which will consider strengthening the goals to limit temperature rises to 1.5°C.
The EU wanted a clear timetable and a promise to deliver a legally binding treaty, but failed to get this. The 2015 review does, though, fit with the thinking of Stavros Dimas, the European commissioner for the environment.
Climate negotiators could take a leaf out of the global postal sector's book.
Connie Hedegaard's risk in Durban was redemption for the EU after its embarrassing failure at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen in 2009.
When the EU moves, others follow, writes the European Commissioner for climate action on the breakthrough deal struck at the Durban summit on climate change.
South Africa and Brazil are now prepared to sign up to a roadmap, but other major countries are holding out.