Go to the Content   Saturday, 26 May 2012
 
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Management

Commission held to account

By Simon Taylor  -  16.06.2011 / 05:01 CET
The annual reports from the heads of European Commission departments give clues as to how well EU money is being spent.

Please log in to read this article:

Log-in

Password

Forgot your password? Just type in your e-mail address and click on the Log In button

 

Don't have a login yet?

Discover your benefits and register for free now! It only takes a minute.

 Register for free

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2012 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Varrow

Most viewed in EU governance

Unions complain of threats to staff

Stickers left on cars of EU civil servants as Unions warn of rising anti-EU aggression.

news_cravate030512

Orbán myth or urban legend? You need an active subscription to read this article

Commission to move into the Orban building.

entre_frereorban_030512

Only Connect! You need an active subscription to read this article

A new name for the directorate-general for information society and media.

entre_kroes_260412
Picture 1
Fact file

Budget responsibility and annual activity reports

The European Commission is responsible under the EU's treaties for implementing the EU's budget. The Commission takes political responsibility for management of the budget, while operational implementation is the responsibility of directors-general and heads of service, who are designated as ‘authorising officers by delegation' (AODs).

AODs produce annual activity reports (AARs), which include a signed declaration of assurance on the legality and regularity of financial transactions. This assurance contains an assessment of the effectiveness of control.

AODs can enter reservations in their declarations in order to highlight problems. AARs are the principal mechanism allowing AODs to document their accountability to the college of commissioners. The synthesis report is a summary of the AARs – a tool by which the commissioners take responsibility for what is done with the power that has been delegated to Commission departments.

Error rates

An error rate of 2% or less is considered to be below the level of materiality.

An error rate of 2%-5% constitutes a material level of error.

An error rate of above 5% is considered “very serious” by the Court of Auditors.

Tolerable risk of error

In May 2002, the Commission published a communication entitled “More or less controls? Striking the balance between the administrative cost of controls and the risk of error”. It suggested a tolerable risk of error range for a number of policy areas of 2%-5%. But the figures and the approach used have not been endorsed by the European Court of Auditors.

Suspending payments

In 2010, the Commission interrupted payments worth a total of €2.6 billion.

Member states made €3.6bn worth of financial corrections to regional programmes in 2000-06 (including €1.7bn in recoveries and withdrawals of €1.9bn).

Related articles

Progress on the first European Citizens' Initiatives.

The Czechs' accidental European commissioner.

Patrick Lambert on a career that led from British Gas to leadership of the Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation.

Stickers left on cars of EU civil servants as Unions warn of rising anti-EU aggression.

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website
 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website

Advertisement

Privacy policy | Terms & conditions