Go to the Content   Friday, 10 February 2012
 

Fizziness that won't go flat

By Jennifer Rankin  -  25.02.2010 / 04:20 CET
The soft-drinks industry has heeded calls to limit advertising targeted at children and intends to extend that voluntary ban online. But self-regulation is now coming under scrutiny.

Please log in to read this article:

Log-in

Password

Forgot your password? Just type in your e-mail address and click on the Log In button

 

Don't have a login yet?

Discover your benefits and register for free now! It only takes a minute.

 Register for free

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2012 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Varrow

Most viewed in Health & society

EU takes over biocides approval from member states

Authorisation regime will now be handled by the European Chemicals Agency.

'Inconclusive' data about breast implant risks

Commission report says more information needed on health risks from implants made by French firm.

business_implants_120112

Call for tougher EU rules after breast implant safety scare

Different reactions from member states to health scare.

business_implants_120112
Fact file

The soft-drink approach

Soft-drinks producers have drafted guidelines to extend existing commitments on restricting advertising to children to all kinds of web-based and electronic communications. Companies that sign the pledge are expected to ensure that online marketing appears only on websites where at least 50% of the visitors are above the age of 12. Companies should also ensure that their own websites are not targeting children under the age of 12.
The association will ask an independent auditor (yet to be chosen) to assess their progress in meeting their targets. Salvatore Gabola, chairman of marketing and communications at Unesda, says he hopes to reach 80% compliance by the end of the year and ultimately “as close as possible to 100%”. A growing industry devoted to assessing website traffic, including age breakdown, would help Unesda to know if it was meeting its target, he said. One of the most straightforward changes should be the briefs that the soft-drinks companies give to their advertising firms: “I would find it a real miss if we fail to modify the briefs for agencies,” says Gabola.

Who regulates?

In 2005 Markos Kyprianou, the then European commissioner for health, warned the food and drink industry that it had a year to stop advertising directly to children or face legislation. Since then self-regulation has become increasingly common in Europe.

An EU-funded study by the International Association for the Study of Obesity on “policies on marketing food and beverages to children” (Polmark) has found that eight out of 12 European governments with policies on food and drink advertising have worked with private companies. But this has not prevented the adoption of legislation. The UK has banned advertising of sugary and salty foods designed to appeal to children, although a similar proposal in France failed by one vote in 2009.

The Polmark researchers found wide variations in the nature of the restrictions adopted. They argue that governments need a clearer view of their aims, and firmer ways of holding companies to account.

Related articles

European commissioner for health tells member states to ensure safety of medical devices.

Commission report says more information needed on health risks from implants made by French firm.

Authorisation regime will now be handled by the European Chemicals Agency.

Different reactions from member states to health scare.

Cadmium was added to banned list as part of the REACH chemicals legislation last year.

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website
 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website

Advertisement

Disclaimer | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions