Go to the Content   Monday, 1 December 2008
 
Home > Policies > Business > Financial services

Is McCreevy losing the light touch?

By Simon Taylor
04.09.2008 / 00:00 CET
Europe's financial actors fear that their ability to compete at internatonal level will be damaged.

Unable to see the text of this article?

Not all our articles are available for free.

Subscribers have access to all our articles. Our archive currently contains roughly 30,000 articles, dating back to 1995.

Registered users can read all articles published within the past three months. (There is one exception to this rule: registered users can read articles from our latest newspaper edition only one week after they were published.)

 

© 2008 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Picture 1
CHARLIE MCCREEVY The internal market commissioner is under attack for trying to ‘create a legacy'. EC
Fact file

Solvency II

Reaching agreement on updated rules on solvency for insurance companies is a key priority for the French presidency of the EU. The proposal for revising the directive will be discussed by EU finance ministers when they hold their informal meeting in Nice on 12-13 September. But obstacles are prompting doubts that agreement can be reached by the end of this year or early 2009 – the deadline for agreeing new rules to come into force in 2012.
The revision, aimed at more efficient regulation of insurance companies that have operations in more than one member state, is strongly backed by the industry. It would give supervisory authorities in the insurer's home state more powers over subsidiaries. But some central and east European countries fear this would offer too much advantage to the large pan-European insurance groups and their domestic regulators.
Opinions also differ over the assets that insurance companies are required to hold to meet solvency requirements. EU officials say the French presidency is pushing for other countries to adopt French-style rules for the treatment of equities as assets. This is strongly resisted by some countries, and officials warn that any agreement on a revision of the directive depends on a more flexible approach.
Related articles

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website
 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website