Go to the Content   Wednesday, 19 June 2013

Close

About cookies: we use cookies to support features like login and sharing articles. Keep cookies enabled to enjoy the full site experience. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review our cookies information for more details.
 
PROPERTY RIGHTS

Lost homes and legal battles: Beneš Decrees

By Andrew Gardner  -  05.11.2009 / 07:00 CET
Why have the Beneš Decrees, which legitimated the post-war expulsion of Germans from Czechoslovakia, surfaced so persistently as a political problem?
 

This article is reserved for paying subscribers...

FullOffer_small

Log-in:

Password:

Forgot your password? Just type in your email address and click on the Log In button

Select your offer today and receive:

Register Online Print
Hover over for more info

Free

€3 per week

€3.50 per week

Daily online news
Full access on mobile devices
E-alert customisable by policy
Access to editorial, comment
Profiles
Special reports
Access to the archives
Access to the e-paper
Newspaper delivered weekly
Register
Select offer
Select offer

For more information please contact evsubscriptions@economist.com or call +32 2 540 9098


Please log in to read this article:

Log-in

Password

Forgot your password? Just type in your e-mail address and click on the Log In button

 

Don't have a login yet?

Discover your benefits and register for free now! It only takes a minute.

Register for free

© 2013 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Varrow

Most viewed in Justice

MEPs to vote on new asylum rules

Legislation completes EU asylum system.

news_asylum_060613

Commission launches plan for collective redress across the EU

Recommendation includes safeguards to avoid US-style class action abuse.

entre_reding_060912

Support for ‘unambitious' common rules on asylum

Compromise deal backed, but MEPs are not happy at actions of member states.

news_asylum_130613
Picture 1
Fact file

Uprooted, expelled and transferred

Millions of Germans were uprooted from Poland and Czechoslovakia; hundreds of thousands from Hungary, Romania and Yugoslavia; and smaller numbers from the Baltic states and the Netherlands.

A large number of Germans fled their homes. Others were moved: they were expelled, physically transferred or swapped. In the Baltic states and Yugoslavia, flight was most common; in Poland, the predominant method is questioned and the population movements particularly large and varied; in the Netherlands, expulsions were followed by a larger population transfer in the other direction; in Czechoslovakia, officially sanctioned expulsions outnumbered spontaneous expulsions.

The countries they were uprooted from included protectorates (Poland, Bohemia and Moravia), puppet states (Slovakia, Croatia, the Netherlands), Axis allies (Hungary, Romania), and countries caught in civil war for much of the time (most of Yugoslavia). Large ethnic-German minorities remained in some countries (eg, Romania); only a rump remained in others (eg, Czechoslovakia, Poland). Varying numbers of the residual ethnic-German minorities took up West Germany's Cold War offer of resettlement (particularly the case in Romania). The number of Hungarians expelled from Czechoslovakia (about 50,000) was smaller than the number of Slovaks and Hungarians (about 120,000 each) who were moved in a bilaterally agreed population transfer in 1946.

 

A sensitive subject

The tangled history of a planned documentation centre on forced migration in Berlin reflects the sensitivity of the topic in Germany.

The centre was, in its original form, a project of the Union of the Expelled (BdV), an association of ethnic Germans expelled from central and eastern Europe. Over the years, it was toned down and received the backing of the government, which was given the last word on appointments to the centre's governing board.
The BdV was given three seats on the board but was thwarted this spring when it tried to nominate its president, Erika Steinbach, to one of those seats.

A member of the German parliament for the governing Christian Democratic Union (CDU), Steinbach is a highly divisive figure. Her nomination was opposed by the CDU's coalition partner at the time, the Social Democrats, and by the Polish government.

Now that the Social Democrats have been displaced in the federal government coalition by the Free Democrats (FDP), the BdV wants to try again; a decision is expected on 17 November. During a visit to Warsaw last Saturday (31 October), Guido Westerwelle, Germany's new foreign minister and leader of the FDP, signalled that he opposed Steinbach's nomination. The matter could easily turn into the first serious challenge for Chancellor Angela Merkel's new coalition.

Related articles

While EU-Azeri co-operation on energy has flourished, Azerbaijan's human-rights record has deteriorated.

Compromise deal backed, but MEPs are not happy at actions of member states.

Group leaders send controversial proposal back to civil-liberties committee.

Recommendation includes safeguards to avoid US-style class action abuse.

Legislation completes EU asylum system.

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website
 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website

Advertisement

Cookies info | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions