Go to the Content   Saturday, 26 May 2012
 

Medicine ruling leaves a bad taste

08.03.2007 / 00:00 CET
Novartis has received concerns regarding our ongoing legal challenge in India, following the denial of the patent for our ground-breaking cancer treatment, Glivec.
We believe there is a need to ensure the facts of the issue are clear. This case is not about access to medicines; in India, 99% of patients who receive Glivec receive it free from Novartis. Our legal actions are about seeking clarity on how innovation is valued and protected in India. The Indian patent law limits patents to new chemical entities and does not recognise other forms of innovation necessary to bring better medicines to patients. We believe this unique hurdle to patentability in India is not in line with the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).
Our actions in India do not hinder the supply of medicines to poor countries. The outcome of our case has no impact on the availability of HIV/AIDS drugs. While India is sometimes referred to as the “pharmacy of the developing world”, it is worth noting that generic companies target their sales elsewhere. Sustainable access to medicines in developing countries is complex and requires much more than the availability of generic drugs.
As the second-largest manufacturer of generics, Novartis understands and recognises the contribution of generics once drug patents expire; our concern is with the non-recognition of intellectual property rights that ultimately help sustain and advance pharmaceutical research and development.

Meni Styliadou
Novartis
Brussels

Please log in to read this article:

Log-in

Password

Forgot your password? Just type in your e-mail address and click on the Log In button

 

Don't have a login yet?

Discover your benefits and register for free now! It only takes a minute.

 Register for free

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2012 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Varrow

Most viewed in Comment

Related articles

There is a ‘fire problem' and it costs hundreds of lives a year.

Burying the Lisbon treaty would not paralyse the EU.

Europe is in danger of undermining its competitiveness byt backing policy proposals that have no track record of boosting innovation.

Liquid biofuels – ethanol and ‘biodiesel' – have captured the worldwide and European fascination as renewable energy for the transport sector, but the tide seems to be turning now that people are realising the inherent challenges of leaping into a liquid biofuels policy in the absence of adequate consideration of the down-stream results.

A handful of European shoemakers are soon likely to request an extension of EU anti-dumping duties on leather footwear from Vietnam and China. But contrary to what your article may lead people into thinking (‘Shoemakers fight cheap imports', 24-29 April), these producers do not speak in the interest of the majority of the European footwear industry, let alone European consumers.

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website
 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website

Advertisement

Privacy policy | Terms & conditions