Go to the Content   Saturday, 26 May 2012
 
FOREIGN AFFAIRS European External Action Service

MEPs win concessions on EEAS

By Toby Vogel  -  14.10.2010 / 05:19 CET
Agreement struck on financial regulation and no deal yet on revisions to staff regulation.

Please log in to read this article:

Log-in

Password

Forgot your password? Just type in your e-mail address and click on the Log In button

 

Don't have a login yet?

Discover your benefits and register for free now! It only takes a minute.

 Register for free

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2012 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Varrow

Most viewed in EU governance

Three EU agencies warned over irregularities

European Parliament delays approving 2010 accounts of three agencies over allegations of conflicts of interest.

PLenary_voting_thumbD110711(EP)

EFSA chair resigns over conflict of interest

Diána Bánáti leaves EFSA to rejoin International Life Sciences Institute Europe.

Diána Bánáti

Row over EFSA chairwoman's resignation

Diána Bánáti says she was not asked to resign from food authority.

news_banati_100512
Picture 1
Fact file

Ashton calls for swift decision on headquarters

Catherine Ashton, the EU's foreign policy chief, has asked the EU's member states to decide swiftly on the future headquarters of the European External Action Service (EEAS).
In a confidential presentation to member states' ambassadors in Brussels yesterday (13 October), Ashton made it clear that her preferred option is the Capital building on RondPoint Schuman, which would cost €10 million to rent each year.
“There will not be a proper diplomatic service until we have all its bits united in a single building,” an aide to Ashton said. The aide said that the officials of the European Commission and the Council of Ministers that are to be transferred to the EEAS are currently dispersed across eight different buildings at a projected annual cost of €25 million.
Three options
Ashton outlined three options: the Council's Lex building; the Commission's Charlemagne building; and the Capital building, a new development owned by AXA, a private company.
The Charlemagne is a “non-runner”, according to a source, as it is the most expensive to rent. Moreover, displacing its current main tenant, the Commission's department for trade, would entail additional costs.
The Lex building is difficult because it would need to be fitted to meet security standards, which would take up to two years. The Capital building, by contrast, meets those standards.
Toby Vogel

Related articles

Catherine Ashton makes a good call.

Diána Bánáti says she was not asked to resign from food authority.

European Parliament delays approving 2010 accounts of three agencies over allegations of conflicts of interest.

What's on the roof of the European Economic and Social Committee?

Diána Bánáti leaves EFSA to rejoin International Life Sciences Institute Europe.

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website
 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website

Advertisement

Privacy policy | Terms & conditions