Go to the Content   Saturday, 26 May 2012
 

Rolling the dice in court

By Jim Brunsden  -  30.09.2010 / 04:13 CET
In the absence of EU legislation on gambling, it often falls on the European Court of Justice to decide on the compatibility of national gambling laws.

Please log in to read this article:

Log-in

Password

Forgot your password? Just type in your e-mail address and click on the Log In button

 

Don't have a login yet?

Discover your benefits and register for free now! It only takes a minute.

 Register for free

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2012 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Varrow

Most viewed in Health & society

Islam's European hope

The example of European Jewry suggests ways in which Europe's Muslim minorities may change.

Essalaam Mosque_Rotterdam(R)

Borrell stays silent You need an active subscription to read this article

Josep Borrell's role at the European University Institute's conference.

entre_borrell_100512

EU urged to do more to tackle depression at work

European Depression Association calls for 'co-ordinated action'.

pensions(ec)
Fact file

Anxious authorities

The past decade has seen a number of high-profile arrests and fines by national authorities anxious to prevent foreign gambling companies from forcing their way onto national markets.

In 2001, Italy closed hundreds of shops that offered services provided by Stanleybet, a firm that provides ‘agents' – shops – with remote terminals on which international bets can be placed via servers based in the UK and Malta. A number of arrests were made. Similarly, there have been arrests and shop closures in Greece linked to Stanleybet's activities.

In 2006, the chief executives of Austrian online betting firm Bwin were arrested in France when they arrived at AS Monaco to announce a sponsorship deal with the football club. The two men, Manfred Bodner and Norbert Teufelberger, were released on bail. Despite recent reforms to the French gambling market, the investigation continues. Thomas Talos, Bwin's legal counsellor, believes the case will be dropped soon.

In 2007, Petter Nylander, at the time chief executive of online gambling firm Unibet, suffered a similar fate. He was arrested by Dutch police after France issued a European arrest warrant. This followed a complaint by Française des Jeux and Pari Mutuel Urbain, which at the time had a duopoly over sports betting in France. They argued that Unibet's marketing activities, such as sponsorship deals, impinged on their privileges. At the time, the European Commission said that “in our view somebody might have been arrested who is innocent under [EU] law”. Nylander was released on bail, but the investigation is continuing.

Bwin, the largest publicly listed online gambling operator on mainland EU, has run foul of a number of national authorities. The Portuguese authorities fined Bwin €74,500 for, in 2005, concluding a football sponsorship deal that they said breached a non-profit-making organisation's monopoly over sports betting. Bwin is currently facing litigation in Germany, Portugal and Slovenia linked to sponsorship deals and advertising.

There have also been instances in which national authorities have simply blocked people's access to online gambling websites.

Related articles

Europe seems to be turning away from the West.

Ten arguments to counter pessimism about the future.

Western and southern Europe would do well to mine ‘eastern' Europe's know-how.

Why the European Commission should include behavioural insights in the design of regulatory proposals.

Amélie Empereur on how she developed a taste and stomach for European affairs lobbying.

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website
 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website

Advertisement

Privacy policy | Terms & conditions