Go to the Content   Saturday, 26 May 2012
 
EU FUNDS Oversight

Slow progress on funding rules

By Constant Brand  -  20.10.2011 / 05:10 CET
MEPs seek greater say over how funds are spent.

Please log in to read this article:

Log-in

Password

Forgot your password? Just type in your e-mail address and click on the Log In button

 

Don't have a login yet?

Discover your benefits and register for free now! It only takes a minute.

 Register for free

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2012 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Varrow

Most viewed in Business

The World Bank's wrong choice

The selection of Jim Yong Kim gives cause for concern.

World Bank

Lessons for the EU from JPMorgan

Financial firm's woes should serve as a warning to the EU.

MEPs back tighter bank rules

Banks required to cap bankers' bonuses, increase capital buffers; Parliament endorses stricter budgetary surveillance of eurozone members.

Dublin?business(R)
Picture 1
Fact file

FINANCIAL QUESTIONS

What is the financial regulation?

The EU's financial regulation sets the rules on how funds from the EU budget are handed out. It also sets guidelines on how these funds should be administered and controlled by the European Commission, the European Parliament and member states.

How important is it to the EU budget?

The regulation is vital for Commission officials and national administrations as they are responsible for ensuring that projects agreed to under, for example, the Common Agricultural Policy or cohesion policy, are properly funded and carried out.

What are these negotiations about?

Under treaty rules, the financial regulation must be updated every three years. The current revision also takes account of changes introduced by the Lisbon treaty, which came into force in December 2009. For the first time, the Parliament will have an equal say in approving changes to the regulation, alongside member states.

What is the main sticking-point?

MEPs want more rigorous controls of how EU funds are spent to avoid mismanagement and fraud. They are proposing that member states agree to provide the Commission with an annual statement of “national management declarations”, taking responsibility to ensure EU funds are spent properly. Member states oppose this, fearing that MEPs will have too much say over the way they spend EU funds.

Related articles

The sorry saga of JPMorgan has major implications for banks across the European Union.

Talks will now begin with European Parliament on regulation of agencies.

Differences lead to postponement of vote.

Financial firm's woes should serve as a warning to the EU.

UK drops opposition to new rules on bank capital and liquidity.

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website
 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website

Advertisement

Privacy policy | Terms & conditions