Friday 18 April 2014
Advertise  |  Subscribe  |  Register  | 

Close

About cookies: we use cookies to support features like login and sharing articles. Keep cookies enabled to enjoy the full site experience. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review our cookies information for more details.

Taking another view on Georgia

By Chairman, Committee on foreign relations Georgian Parliament Kutaisi  -  21.02.2013 / 04:45 CET
Journalists seem to be misinformed on Georgia.

In a recent commentary Edward Lucas continues a distressing thread of reporting on events in Georgia (“Playing foul, crying foul”, 14-20 February). While I consider him a good friend and an unbiased analyst, it appears he is one of a number of Western journalists of late who seem to be misinformed.

For the next seven months, the country will be governed in co-habitation between the sitting president and a new prime minister, who decisively defeated the old government led by the president's party. Bidzina Ivanishvili won primarily because he promised to right the wrongs of President Mikheil Saakashvili's authoritarian leadership. As he takes steps to do so, Saakashvili is responding angrily. He is skilfully using a sympathetic Western press to suggest that Ivanishvili is undemocratic and, even worse, pro-Russian.

Many of these reports are based on a selective use of the facts. This time it is Lucas who claims that Ivanishvili demonstrated anti-democratic tendencies during a recent commotion at the Georgian national library. He buttresses his case by assembling part of the picture. There was, in fact, an altercation, but Lucas leaves out some important facts.

The reader is left with an impression of a president hounded off the platform by Ivanishvili's thugs. A more objective analysis, such as that recently released by Oxford Analytica, described Saakashvili's behaviour as an unconvincing diatribe against the Ivanishvili government. It went on to say: Saakashvili amply demonstrated the declining political resources of his United National Movement. These conclusions do not fit into Lucas's picture, so he ignores them.

For example, he somehow forgot to mention the provocations from Saakashvili supporters that helped spark the clashes, only saying police seemed unwilling to intervene; or the fact that Saakashvili decided on his own initiative to speak at the unsecured library, against the advice of Georgian security officials.

Lucas suggests that Saakashvili has been trying to co-habit with the new government, but to no avail. The fact is that the president has sought to undermine and discredit Ivanishvili's government almost from the moment of its dramatic upset victory. His former prime minister, Vano Merabishvili, recently went as far as to say that Ivanishvili's forces should be purged from Georgian political life.

Ivanishvili's efforts to build dialogue with Russia are in fact producing results. Trade is resuming for a Georgian economy devastated by a war with Russia that saw 20% of the country's territory lost to its then-largest trading partner.

In a strong sign of closer ties, Štefan Füle, the European commissioner for neighbourhood policy, was in Georgia this month to sign off a major EU aid programme. NATO officials are noting improved relations with a new defence minister, and Georgia has boosted its commitment to NATO operations in Afghanistan.

Those truly interested in helping democracy take hold should heed the voices of the Georgian people. The following passage from an open letter signed by 18 leading Georgian intellectuals says it all: “How can we convince Western political and financial circles that tyranny has developed in our country in the past nine years? How can we convince them to stop strengthening the remnants of this tyranny by means of their financial or verbal support? And what type of future will our democratic civilisation have if non-democratic regimes continue to be patronised in the future?”

Tedo Japaridze

© 2014 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Varrow

Most viewed in Foreign affairs

EU brings forward Moldova, Georgia deals

Crisis in Crimea prompts EU leaders to push for completion of deals by mid-year.

Council 21 March 2014

EU condemns Turkey's Twitter ban

Turkish prime minister's decision to block the social networking site described as 'groundless, pointless and cowardly'.

Erdogan serious

Ukraine signs landmark EU deal

Ukraine signs political section of association agreement with EU, but delays signing of trade element.

newsyatsenyuk1303
lettersgeorgia_flag(r)2102

Related articles

The managing director of the World Economic Forum says that the popular upheaval in Ukraine has primarily been a striving for better governance, more effective institutions and a state that serves its people.

Parliament agrees to three legal amendments.

The European Union on Monday eased its call for constitutional change in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a switch from the demand that has dominated its policy towards the country over the past year.

EEAS to reinforce its delegations in Ukraine.

EU could provide €600m bail-out loans by mid-year.

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website

Please, copy the code on the left into the box on the right

 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website

Advertisement

Cookies info | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions