Friday 18 April 2014
Advertise  |  Subscribe  |  Register  | 


About cookies: we use cookies to support features like login and sharing articles. Keep cookies enabled to enjoy the full site experience. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review our cookies information for more details.

The biggest casualty of budget cuts will be humanitarian aid

31.01.2013 / 03:50 CET
Attempting to balance the EU budget on the backs of the world's poorest is against the EU's own interests

Toby Vogel suggested in a blog post that a deal on the European Union's budget for 2014-20 is probably very close (“Inside Herman Van Rompuy's mind”, 25 January). If the final budget is like the proposal discussed by national leaders in November, the biggest casualty will be humanitarian and development aid. This would be terrible.

That proposal disproportionately targeted EU external spending, cutting €6.1 billion to development aid and more than a billion to humanitarian aid from the European Commission's proposal, which the European Parliament said should be “the bare minimum”.

There is a general agreement that the EU budget should be for the benefit of EU citizens. But it should also provide the Union with the means to live up to its ambitions and commitments as a global player. EU aid is not only morally right; it is an economically sound investment.

The EU's humanitarian and development aid is one of the most efficient, impactful and transparent in the world: this has been reiterated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, governments, independent think-tanks and civil-society organisations. It delivers significant, very real results. In the past three years, EU aid has stopped 50 million people in more than 50 countries from being hungry, has provided access to primary education for more than 9 million children and ensured 4 million more safe births. In just six years, it has given more than 31 million people access to safe drinking water.

Aid is also a smart and strategic investment. Aid flows increase trade and promote stability and security. Moreover, EU aid promotes growth within Europe itself. Recent research by the Overseas Development Institute and ONE showed that EU aid could yield a net gain in EU GDP of €11.5 billion by 2020, by boosting trade. Few investments can provide such a rapid and far-reaching impact for so little. EU aid costs less than the price of a cup of coffee per person per week.

So why attempt to balance the EU budget on the backs of the world's poorest at the expense of the Union's common interest and commitments?

It cannot be right to intend to cut EU aid by 12%, while the proposed cut to the overall budget is 7%.

EU leaders should show that the EU still has ambitions to remain a leader in the fight against poverty and humanitarian disasters. The European Commission's proposal was balanced. It should be supported and the aid budget ring-fenced.

Natalia Alonso

Oxfam International


Tim Roosen

Action for Global Health


Karen Schroh

Plan EU


Eloise Todd

ONE Campaign


© 2014 European Voice. All rights reserved.

Most viewed in Economics


Related articles

Council has called for “considerable budget constraints”.

Former Italian prime minister will examine ways the EU can collect its own financial resources outside of member state contributions.

The Greek parliament approved the draft 2014 budget by a slender margin late on Saturday (7 November), following five days of heated debate.

Negotiations with international creditors over budget and reforms to resume this week

Agreement also given to budget for 2014.




Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields



Please, copy the code on the left into the box on the right

 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website


Cookies info | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions