Go to the Content   Saturday, 26 May 2012
 

What next for the (rejected) Lisbon treaty?

By Simon Taylor and Jim Brunsden  -  19.06.2008 / 00:00 CET
Ireland voted by 53.4% to 46.6% to reject the Treaty of Lisbon. The vote calls at least a temporary halt to the reforms that the treaty would have introduced. So if the Lisbon treaty is not ratified, what will be the implications for the European Union?

Please log in to read this article:

Log-in

Password

Forgot your password? Just type in your e-mail address and click on the Log In button

 

Don't have a login yet?

Discover your benefits and register for free now! It only takes a minute.

 Register for free

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2012 European Voice. All rights reserved.
Varrow

Most viewed in Policies

Picture 1
Irish support Gerard Batten, member of the UK Independence Party (centre) with Godfrey Bloom (right), also of UKIP, and Bastiaan Belder, of the Dutch Independence Democracy Group, show their support for the Irish ‘No' vote in the European Parliament yesterday (18 June). REUTERS
Fact file

Treaty timeline

2000: Nice treaty agreed by EU leaders. 

2002: Nice treaty ratified (after two Irish referendums) – and still in force.

2004: Constitutional treaty agreed by EU leaders.

2005: Constitutional treaty rejected by France and the Netherlands – and dropped.

2006: Accession treaty for Bulgaria and Romania ratified (fixing future size of European Parliament) – and still in force.

2007: Lisbon treaty agreed by EU leaders.

2008: Lisbon treaty ratified by 18 member states but rejected by Ireland.

2009: Scheduled entry into force of Lisbon treaty.

Related articles

Citizens' distrust of national institutions is higher.

EU responsibilities change with advent of 2011. 1600 EU officials transferred into EU diplomatic service on 1 January.

Launch events planned in Prague and Brussels; Gaza among priorities for Topolánek.

Emil Boc becomes the country's new prime minister; dealing with economic slowdown high on new government's agenda.

EU officials fail to convince court that they unfairly lost out because of changes to the EU staff regulation.

Advertisement

Comments

 

Your comment
Please note: The fields followed by an asterisk (*) are obligatory fields

Comment*

Name*
E-mail*
Website
 I accept the Terms & conditions
 I would like to share my e-mail & website

Advertisement

Privacy policy | Terms & conditions