Articles in this set
This European Voice special report is made available online for all visitors thanks to Vestas.
There is one clear winner from the gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine: the proposed Nord Stream pipeline, which will bring Russian gas to Europe via the Baltic sea.
The clash between Russia and Ukraine, which left the likes of Bulgaria and Slovakia without gas supplies for nearly three weeks, has boosted the EU's drive to diversify its energy supply routes.
The EU has made a priority of building the Nabucco pipeline, which is supposed to bring gas from the Caspian region through Turkey into Austria, but at the earliest this conduit will be ready only in 2013.
Nord Stream, on the other hand, is expected to be operational in 2011.
The obstacles to completing Nord Stream have largely been political and, to a lesser extent, environmental. When it was announced that the pipeline would run under the Baltic, Radek Sikorski, then Poland's defence minister, now the foreign minister, likened the decision to the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, the 1939 deal between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, which divided Poland between the two dictatorships. Sikorski's over-the-top reaction reflected Poland's fears that its energy security would be weakened if Russia could bypass pipeline that go through Poland.
Political hostility to the project was not helped by the announcement in 2005 that Gerhard Schröder, the former chancellor of Germany, was joining Nord Stream's board. Schröder has earned a reputation as a public apologist for the darker sides of Vladimir Putin's Russia, having once described the former president as “a thorough democrat”.
The countries bordering the Baltic are carrying out assessments of the environmental impact of the pipeline, but it seems unlikely that they will raise sufficiently serious concerns to prevent the project going ahead.
Despite the political reservations and the environmental concerns, the economic and commercial arguments for Nord Stream are powerful.
The pipeline will bring 55 million cubic metres of gas each year from Russian gas-fields into Germany to meet rising demand from western Europe where domestic gas-fields are running out.
The Nord Stream consortium has secured the €7.4 billion funding it needs for construction, despite the reluctance of banks to lend in the current economic downturn. Almost a third of the funding is coming from the shareholders of the Nord Stream consortium: Gazprom (Russia), Wintershall and E.ON Ruhrgas (Germany) and Gasunie (the Netherlands). Half of the remaining 70% will come from commercial bank lending and the rest from export credit agencies.
Nord Stream has also signed contracts for the sale of the gas with five companies, including Dong Energy (Denmark), E.ON Ruhrgas, Suez-Gaz de France, Gazprom UK and Wingas (Germany).
Recent reports that France's Suez-GdF is interested in taking a stake in the consortium reinforce the impression that commercial backing for Nord Stream is strengthening.
Political support for Nord Stream is probably stronger than ever thanks to the New Year gas crisis. As the dispute worsened in the second week of January, Günter Gloser, Germany's state secretary for European affairs, commented: “Of course the Nord Stream project must be an important part of diversification of energy sources”.
Critics argue that Nord Stream diversify supply routes but does nothing to weaken the dependence on Russian gas or dilute the accompanying economic power of Gazprom. But it has the advantages, compared with other pipeline projects such as Nabucco, of secure gas supplies and secure funding.
Even without the recent gas crisis, Nord Stream was on course to become operational in 2011, which means it will start to bring gas to western Europe years before Nabucco.
Most viewed in Policies
The EU should strengthen energy markets, not bureaucracies
The European Union is being asked to introduce controversial rules allowing electricity grid operators to shut down consumers' refrigerators and washing machines remotely in the cause of more efficient use of energy.
Western fortunes are rising, slowly but surely.
Ministers to discuss proposed biofuel limits.
Proposal will temporarily delay the auctioning of emissions allowances in 2013-2015 until 2018-20.
Vestas – No. 1 in Modern Energy
All over the world, people must prepare to use new forms of energy. The sharp rise in energy consumption calls for a sustainable resource that does not create more greenhouse gases, pollution or waste for future generations. Wind power is a renewable, predictable and clean source of energy. Substantial capacity can be built up quickly, offering the energy independence demanded by the world's largest and fastest-growing economies. This is why we call wind power, modern energy.
With a 23 per cent market share in 2007, Vestas is the world's leading supplier of modern energy solutions. We have installed more than 35,000 wind turbines in 63 countries on five continents. We install an average of one wind turbine every four hours around the clock. In 2007 our wind turbines generated more than 60 million MWh – or enough electricity to supply millions of households. These are some of the reasons why Vestas is No. 1 in Modern Energy.
Power your life - Vestas offers you challenging, global opportunities for career growth. As the world leader in modern energy, our wind turbines reduce CO2 emissions by 40 million tons per year. Our employees representing 56 nationalities are eager to welcome new colleagues. Care to join us?