Sunday 20 April 2014
Advertise  |  Subscribe  |  Register  | 

Close

About cookies: we use cookies to support features like login and sharing articles. Keep cookies enabled to enjoy the full site experience. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review our cookies information for more details.

Surprise: Council running late


Thursday 22 November 2012
The summit of EU leaders is running about two hours behind schedule; a debate of the European Council with Martin Schulz, the President of the European Parliament, originally scheduled for 8:00pm, has not yet begun. In fact, the 'confessionals' - meetings between Herman Van Rompuy, the president of the European Council, and each of the 27 member states' leaders, are still underway, some three hours after they were supposed to end. Angela Merkel, Germany's chancellor, and François Hollande, France's president, are up next. 

In the run-up to the summit, and again during the day, several leaders have tried to dampen expectations. "It's possible that we need another stage" to strike a deal, Merkel said, and her diplomats were briefing that an agreement in February (the next scheduled European Council) or March would still allow all required legislation to be put in place before the start of 2014, when the next MFF is supposed to kick in. 

Werner Faymann, Austria's chancellor, has also said this week that he "would not be surprised" if the talks "drag on into February or March". 

It might all go fairly quickly at the end of the first plenary session, diplomats here suggest - with Van Rompuy wrapping up the session by distributing a new compromise proposal and sending the leaders off to their hotel rooms for a few hours of sleep so that real negotiations can take place tomorrow. 

Reactions

Your name or pen-name

Your comment



Toby Vogel

Show info

More comment and analysis

The 2009-14 European Parliament term ended this week, and MEPs used the occasion to vote on 70 pieces of legislation.

Parties show they are taking the elections seriously by putting a number of politically experienced people on the lists.

Member states gain leeway to inspect companies they suspect of social dumping.

Other blogs

Advertisement

 
Cookies info | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions